If you’re a real estate photographer, figuring out how to price your services is one of the biggest challenges you’ll face. Charge too much, and clients will look elsewhere. Charge too little, and you’ll work yourself to death for pennies.

Chances are, you’ve probably used (or considered) one of these common pricing models:

1️⃣ Copying competitors’ prices – You Google what others are charging, average it out, and match or undercut them.
2️⃣ Charging per image – You charge for a set number of photos, like $10 per image or $50 per image.
3️⃣ Pricing per square foot – You base your rate on the size of the property.
4️⃣ Pricing per set of images – A fixed package with 15, 25, 35, or 50 images.

So, which one actually works best? Let’s break it down.


Why Copying Competitors’ Pricing is a Bad Idea

Most photographers start by checking their competitors’ rates. But here’s the problem:

🔴 You’re guessing – You don’t know their overhead, experience, or how much they profit.
🔴 You’re racing to the bottom – If you compete on price alone, you’re stuck in a price war with low-end clients.
🔴 You devalue your workCheap clients bring cheap problems. You’ll deal with constant price negotiations, late payments, and unrealistic expectations.

👉 Lesson: Instead of copying, focus on value. Clients will pay more if you prove your work is worth the investment.


Why Charging Per Image Doesn’t Work

Some photographers charge per image (e.g., “$20 per photo”), but this doesn’t work well for real estate.

🔴 Real estate agents don’t want to count images. They just want their property showcased in the best way possible.
🔴 You’re creating unnecessary decisions. Agents don’t want to decide if a living room needs 3 or 4 angles—they just want the best shots.
🔴 It slows down the sales process. Instead of making it simple, you’re forcing the agent to calculate costs per image, which leads to hesitation.

👉 Lesson: Real estate agents need a quick, predictable pricing model—not a per-image breakdown.


Why Square Foot Pricing Sounds Smart (But Fails in Reality)

A lot of photographers charge per square foot—e.g., “$0.10 per square foot.” It seems logical, but here’s why it falls apart:

🔴 Big spaces don’t always need more photos. A 7,000 sq. ft. home might have 2,000 sq. ft. of hallways, garages, or empty space that doesn’t require extra images.
🔴 Agents start negotiating. Suddenly, agents want to deduct square footage that’s “not needed” (balconies, unfinished rooms, etc.), making pricing a nightmare.
🔴 Some luxury listings prefer fewer photos. Believe it or not, ultra-luxury homes often request fewer images (e.g., 15 high-quality photos instead of 50) to create exclusivity.

👉 Lesson: Square footage doesn’t always determine the workload. You need a better way to price your work.


The Best Pricing Model: Per Set of Images

After hundreds of shoots, I found that the best way to price real estate photography is to charge per set of images.

💡 Example Pricing Tiers:
✔️ 15 Images – Best for small condos & apartments.
✔️ 25 Images – Ideal for 2-3 bedroom homes.
✔️ 35 Images – Covers large homes, duplexes, & standard listings.
✔️ 50 Images – Used for high-end properties or large estates.

Why This Works Best

Simple for agents – No image counting, no square foot confusion.
Flexible for different property sizes – Covers what’s needed without forcing agents to overthink.
Encourages premium pricing – If an agent wants more coverage, they simply buy the next package.

👉 Lesson: Set pricing per image package. It’s clean, simple, and eliminates confusion.


How Much Should You Charge?

Pricing varies by market, but here’s what I charge in Sunny Isles (luxury market):

📷 15 Images – $150
📷 25 Images – $250
📷 35 Images – $350
📷 50 Images – $449
📷 100+ Images – Custom Quote

🔹 For ultra-luxury homes ($5M+), I often shoot just 15-20 images—because exclusivity sells.

🚀 Pro Tip: The larger the property and the higher the listing price, the more you should charge. Luxury clients will pay for premium service.


Final Takeaways: Real Estate Photography Pricing Done Right

1️⃣ Stop competing on price. Position yourself as a premium service.
2️⃣ Avoid per-image & per-square-foot pricing. They create confusion & low-value clients.
3️⃣ Charge by set of images. This simplifies sales & keeps pricing straightforward.
4️⃣ Adjust based on market. Your city, property types, and clientele should dictate pricing.
5️⃣ Luxury listings often need fewer images. Less is more—highlight the best shots, not every corner.

If you’re serious about growing your real estate photography business, focus on VALUE, not low prices.


💬 Have questions about pricing, photography techniques, or scaling your business? Drop a comment below!

🔔 Like this post? Subscribe for more real estate photography tips.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

No spam. No fluff. Just straight value.

Be the first to get exclusive early access to all my latest content, mini-courses, and tutorials before they go live on the blog—sometimes months in advance!

✅ Actionable strategies you can apply right away
✅ Real-world case studies and content breakdowns
✅ First access to exclusive insights, offers, and premium tutorials
✅ No BS. Just straight-up value—nothing else

Unsubscribe anytime. But you probably won’t want to.

© 2025 Michael Shatravka. All Rights Reserved.